24

May

12:16am
Saheli Chowdhury India
De-dollarisation Clashes with India-China Border Dispute

De-dollarisation Clashes with India-China Border Dispute

Saheli Chowdhury India//12:16am, May 24th '23

The global de-dollarisation trend is not totally a bed of roses, or at least there are thorns in the roses that have to be taken into account. While de-dollarisation seems to be an irreversible trend on the global scale, at regional levels it is running into bilateral or regional political tensions. In this regard, one of the most prominent cases is in Asia: the India-China border dispute.

In April 2023, the Chinese national currency, yuan, ranked third in international trade settlements made through the US-dominated SWIFT system. According to data from the system itself, yuan’s share in April was “record high,” although that share was only 4.72%, after euro’s 6.54%. The US dollar remained the main trading currency with a share of 83.95% but this was considered as “approaching years-long lows,” given that its share dropped below 84% only twice throughout the history of the SWIFT since the elimination of the gold standard in 1944.

However, these figures do not reflect the real global situation, as numerous countries worldwide, either under US sanctions or threatened with US sanctions, are conducting trade in national currencies outside the SWIFT system, and the most used currency in such transactions is the Chinese yuan. Discussions are ongoing within the BRICS about launching a common currency for transactions among the bloc members. Another line of discussion has also emerged – how about using the yuan in transactions not only with China but also with other like-minded countries? It is this question that has run into one of the most significant border disputes in the world – that between China and India, and the country that has fallen into the middle of this dispute is Russia.

This year, Chinese yuan replaced US dollar as the most traded currency in Russia. Most bilateral trade between Russia and China, which amounted to $185 billion in 2022, is also being conducted in yuan.

At the same time, bilateral trade between Russia and India reached an all-time high of $40 billion in the fiscal year 2022-2023. In fact, Russia became the second largest supplier of goods to India in the first quarter (January-March) of 2023, according to data from the Ministry of Trade and Industry, government of India.

However, according to experts in economy, this trade will receive a "new boost" if the two countries can start trading in yuan.

"Russia would prefer India to pay in Chinese yuan,” comments Chris Devonshire-Ellis, president of business consultancy firm Dezan Shira & Associates. “But due to political and military differences with China, India is unwilling to do so. Therefore, it is interesting that the main problem facing Russia-India trade is actually this matter of the Chinese yuan.”

If you read our blogs then why not our magazine!!!
Image
Click here to subscribe our monthly magazine

Another interesting thing that Indian media refuses to highlight: despite the bilateral dispute, China is the largest supplier of goods to India, and remained so in the same January-March quarter of 2023, although the value of imports recorded a 15.4% decline compared to the same period of 2022.

While the Indian government appears to be a participant in the global de-dollarisation schemes, it also seems to have the policy of actively avoiding the use of yuan in settling accounts in foreign trade. In this context, India’s increasing imports of Russian crude oil has created a significant trade imbalance between the two traditional trade and diplomatic partners, which, in turn, has led to a currency imbalance as well. This imbalance originates from the fact that the Indian government is paying its Russian counterpart in Indian rupees for all of its imports, including oil. This has generated a significant surplus of the Indian currency in Russia, and Moscow is finding it difficult to exchange that in international markets, because unlike yuan, Indian rupee has not become a currency of foreign reserve or international trade.

In addition to a record increase in bilateral trade, India's trade deficit with Russia also reached historic highs of $34.79 billion between April 2022 and January 2023, driven by a significant increase in Russian crude oil exports to India.

The two governments addressed the trade imbalance and market access issues at the India-Russia Intergovernmental Commission on Trade, Economic, Scientific, Technological and Cultural Cooperation (IRIGC -TEC) held in New Delhi in April this year. India and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), of which Russia is the largest player, are also negotiating a free trade agreement to address questions such as diversification of trade and reduction of trade imbalance between partners.

Amid all this, another issue that needs to be urgently discussed is the India-China border dispute. It must be remembered that the border between the two countries is not a real border negotiated through bilateral discussions, but a line imposed by the British while India was a colony of the British Empire and China was being sacked by the same colonial power.

The India-China border dispute, however, goes much beyond the countries. It also involves claims to some territories by Pakistan. The India-Pakistan relation – or lack thereof – is another well-known issue in global geopolitics, which also remains to be resolved. The fate of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), and even that of the New Silk Route to a certain extent, rest on the resolution of these disputes in South Asia.

Resolving the dispute is not a question of one country being right and another being wrong, contrary to the dominant discussions in media and social media of both countries. It is a question of decolonisation of Asia, which must be a feature of the new multipolar world that is emerging.

Unless this problem gets resolved on the short term, or unless the two governments adopt the reasonable position of not mixing up geopolitics and bilateral politics, the de-dollarisation scenario in Asia will remain complicated.

Editor's Note:

The views and informations expressed in the article are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect the views of The International. We believe in providing a platform for a range of viewpoints from the left.

Jan Patocka on War and History
Brian Patrick Bolger//2:03pm, Jan 2nd '23

Jan Patocka on War and History

To read the Czech philosopher, Jan Patocka, one needs to dispose of concepts and categories, and approach philosophy, politics and history anew. It is the phenomenological essence – to transcend the....

Read More
What is the cause of Peru's political crisis  and who is responsible? – An Interview
Work of The International//5:20pm, Dec 23rd '22

What is the cause of Peru's political crisis and who is responsible? – An Interview

“Many people in urban and wealthier areas do not accept that a peasant who speaks differently from them and dresses differently from them should be their president, and that is why they persecuted him....

Read More
HUNGARY : OLD FASCISM, NEW BOTTLE
Sumedha Chatterjee Dublin//12:00pm, Jun 22nd '21

HUNGARY : OLD FASCISM, NEW BOTTLE

Hungary’s tango with the far right is not new. An intoxicating cocktail of anti Semitism coupled with a hearty dose of the red scare, Hungary’s Arrow Cross Party rose to power in 1944. Though a short-lived....

Read More
MAGA Communists?  Not a Laughing Matter
Owen Williamson USA//6:59am, Oct 20th '22

MAGA Communists? Not a Laughing Matter

The most recent bizarre ideological development to emerge from the present political darkness in the United States is something called “MAGA Communism,” the invention of a couple of online would-be....

Read More
Against ‘‘CAPITALIST REALISM’’ and the ‘‘NEOLIBERAL STATE’’
Megan Sherman//12:38am, Mar 11th '22

Against ‘‘CAPITALIST REALISM’’ and the ‘‘NEOLIBERAL STATE’’

Capitalist realism is the official ideology of the neoliberal state, and is an insidious form of propaganda that seeks to eliminate resistance to regressive corporate tyranny. “Capitalist Realism,”....

Read More
Has Populism Killed Democracy?
Jerry Grey China//12:23am, Mar 5th '23

Has Populism Killed Democracy?

There are two aspects to this comment: one, what is democracy, the other, is how is it different from populism?I’ll provide examples of both; you can form your own opinion and see whether you agree with....

Read More